Our civilisation has fundamental problems with generating and maintaining quality information and keeping it clean from distortions that change it into infomination. TIIT introduced the index of its own, the TIIT Index or TIITX, to be able to assess literally "at a glance" the level of information infomination in a given scientific domain. In a concise form, using the school system rating from one to five,TIITX indicates key areas subject to violation of CUDOS principles or other kind of infomination.
TIIT analysis proves that in the Information Age infomination is the single biggest threat to our civilisation's very existence. TIIT argues that it is of a paramount importance for our civilisation to focus research on this IT phenomenon and find best ways of taming its spread as a matter of urgency.
TIIT has assessed all scientific fields for infomination, by marking each one with an index according to this table. Each field's performance has been evaluated against TIIT Code of Ethics (TOE), the Mertonian Norm or CUDOS.
TIITX is a end result of the TIIT process of infomination evaluation, which indicates the level and other parameters of infomination. Technically TIITX is an integer in a scale from 5 (maximum) to 1 (minimum).
For each TIITX the following TIIITn value and color according to the code are adopted:
In order to evaluate the value of TIITX the following matrix was adopted:
M[R,A,I] C[K,P] = M × C
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | V
| | | | | | V Integer Value of the TIIT Index
| | | | | V P - Policy Bias -----------------> 0 or 1 (good)
| | | | V K - Respect for CUDOS ---> 1 to 5 (highest)
| | | V C - Field's Context Value = KP
| | V I - Intent Against Field's Merit ------> 0 or 1 (good)
| V A - Awareness of Objectives ----------> 0 or 1 (good)
V R - Research Technique Quality -----> 1 to 5 (highest)
M - Field's Merit Value = R(A+I)
M - Field's Merit Value - measure of the Field's convergence with Elements of
R - Research Technique Quality - quality of methodologies applied in the Field - their
research technique, purpose, direction, scope & technologies.
A - Awareness of Objectives - convergence of the Field's theses and research topics
with Primary Elements: ,,,,,,.
I - Intent for Field's Merit - causes of the Field's deviations from each of
,,,,,,, and formally, if it is a result of premeditation or not.
C - Field's Context Value - the Field's objective usefulness for the human community's
familiarisation with Elements.
K - Respect for CUDOS - ethical correctness in the Field, its compatibility with each
of 5 CUDOS components.
P - Policy Bias - the Field's research and development activities (R&D) bias against
KUDOS whether there was premeditation or not..
For detailed description of the above Matrix Elements, the following symbolism is used:
SYMBOL (Matrix Element)index of a Scientific Field (evaluation)
M (Field's Merit Value)Public Administration (6) = MSS10(6)
C (Field's Context Value)Informatics(4) = CFS1(4)
The process of the evaluation consists of the following four steps:
---------------------------------------- STEP 1 ----------------------------------------
M is evaluated according to the following criteria:
---> Evaluation of R, assigning a value of 1 to 5, where Rmax = 5.
---> Evaluation of A, evaluate the level of familiarity with M, value '1' for satisfactory or '0'
---> Evaluation of I, assessment of the cause of unfamiliarity with M, value '0' for premeditation or
'1' for negligence.
---> Calculation of M according to equation:
M = Rexp(A+I)
Mmin = 1(0+0) = 1
Mmax = 5(1+1) = 25
---------------------------------------- STEP 2 ----------------------------------------
Evaluation of C, or the usefulness of discipline's message to society according to the following criteria:
---> Evaluation of K, assigning a value of 1 to 5, where Kmax = 5. Each of the five CUDOS
components has a value of 1 for 'no shortcomings' or 0 for 'shortcoming', also indicated in
the text by . The exception is Originality, which TIIT arbitrarily assigned a fixed value 1.
---> Sum calculation K = K+U+D+1+S, Kmax = 5, Kmin = 1.
---> Evaluation of P, a value of 1 for 'no shortcomings' or 0 for 'shortcomings' ().
P indicates the convergence with , therefore, the usefulness of sending discipline for
human civilisation agenda.
---> The calculation of C according to equation:
C= KexpP = KP
Cmin = 1exp0 = 10 = 1
Cmax = 5exp1 = 51 = 5
---------------------------------------- STEP 3 ----------------------------------------
In this Step the results from previous Steps are summarised in the following matrix:
TIITX => M[R,A,I] × C[K,P]
TIITX value is therefore calculated of the equation:
TIITXn = Mn × Cn
Mmin × Cmin = 1
Mmax × Cmax = 125
|M × C =
|M × C =
|M × C =
|M × C =
|M × C =
TIITX denotes a level of infomination of an evaluated scientific field or theory. In other words, it transparently demonstrates a degree of a scientific field's unorthodoxy against its original purpose and level of bias in governance and condition of deliverability of its objectives.
---------------------------------------- STEP 4 ----------------------------------------
---> Assign a total TIITX value to the evaluated field of science, by averaging TIITXn values
obtained in STEP 3 above for all sub-disciplines, and rounding up decimal values > 0.5 = 1, as
in the examples below:
( + + ) / 3 =
( + + ) / 3 =
TIIT INDEX (TIITX) FORMULA(an example)
The following example shows how the TIIT Index values obtained in STEP 4 above are attributed to a sub-discipline:
FIELD OF SCIENCE 3 (number of sub-disciplines)
25[5,1,1] 3[3,1] = 075 SUB-DISCIPLINE 1
03[3,0,1] 3[3,1] = 009 SUB-DISCIPLINE 2
16[4,1,1] 1[5,0] = 016 SUB-DISCIPLINE 3
| | | | | | | |
where: M[R,A,I] C[K,P] = M × C
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | V
| | | | | | V Integer Value of the TIIT Index
| | | | | V P - Policy Bias -----------------> 0 or 1 (good)
| | | | V K - Respect for CUDOS ---> 1 to 5 (highest)
| | | V C - Field's Context Value = KP
| | V I - Intent Against Field's Merit ------> 0 or 1 (good)
| V A - Awareness of Objectives ----------> 0 or 1 (good)
V R - Research Technique Quality -----> 1 to 5 (highest)
M - Field's Merit Value = R(A+I)
GENERAL NOTE ON COMPLIANCE
Under TOE, TIIT has an obligation to tag the information that it thinks is considerably infominated and take the necessary steps to warn all users about the fact, ultimately seeking to prevent infomination from being circulated.
TIIT strives to lead the way to achieving the optimal levels of the general community organisation, step by step, as contemplated by its Strategic Plan.
TIIT approach to complex issue of ethical conduct is included in Corporate Information. and thus maintain the scientific ethos.
Philosophy behind ethics is of key importance for TIIT in seeking to control infomination
TOE is the key reference point in the process of infomination evaluation, when a sample's context value is sought.
In case of a scientific field TIITX assesses the field's merit value and context value, part of which is the field's alignment with ethics.
In particular, a scientific field's TIITX average value may be altered significantly to a much lower total, if the overall performance of the field is found in breach of TOE.
Conceptually, information is the message being conveyed.
In more restricted technical sense, information is a sequence of symbols that can be interpreted as a message. Ultimately, it is any kind of event that affects the state of a dynamic system, meaning a reactive system, one that responds/reacts to external information.
CUDOS is an acronym based on the MERTONIAN NORM, used to denote principles that should define science and guide scientific research at all times.
The CUDOS principles require that the scientific ethos be governed by Communalism, Universalism, Disinterestedness, Originality and Skepticism. In contemporary academic debate the outlined definition is one used most widely.
Scientific results are the common property of the entire community.
All can contribute to science regardless of ethnicity, gender or culture.
The institutional goal of science is recognition, not profit.
Scientific claims must contribute something new.
Scientific claims must be available to critical scrutiny at all times.
A system is a set of interacting or interdependent components forming an integrated whole or a set of elements (often called 'components' ) and relationships, which are different from relationships of the set or its elements to other elements or sets.
A system is regarded as dynamic if it responds to events not only on the context, but also on the history of prior events.
NATURAL SCIENCES 117
Natural Sciences are the key to all knowledge, as their task is to quantify our perception of the nature and thus enable us to obtain the picture of the world close to of PRAVDA. Mistakes in Natural Sciences are unforgiving, as every shortcoming here is instantly reflected elsewhere, echoing throughout all science and philosophy until the consequences make us think again and go for more research.
No philosophy or round mouthful will ever substitute a discovery achieved in the process of unbiased research in natural science, and it is amazing to observe how slow mankind is in learning this simple truth. Low score of the TIIT Index for all Natural Sciences precisely reflects the fact and indicates the need to fight the infomination, which deeply affects our research at every level.
ASTRONOMY (NS1) 15
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 RADIO ASTRONOMY
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 INFRARED ASTRONOMY
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 OPTICAL ASTRONOMY
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 ULTRAVIOLET ASTRONOMY
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 X-RAY ASTRONOMY
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 GAMMA-RAY ASTRONOMY
09[3,1,1] 5[5,1]=045 OTHER THAN THE EM SPECTRUM
04[4,0,1] 5[5,1]=020 CELESTIAL MECHANICS
04[4,0,1] 1[4,0]=004 THEORETICAL ASTRONOMY
04[4,1,0] 5[5,1]=020 SOLAR ASTRONOMY
04[2,1,1] 1[5,0]=004 PLANETARY SCIENCE
09[3,1,1] 5[5,1]=045 STELLAR ASTRONOMY
05[5,0,1] 4[4,1]=020 GALACTIC ASTRONOMY
09[3,1,1] 5[5,1]=045 EXTRAGALACTIC ASTRONOMY
05[5,0,1] 3[3,1]=015 COSMOLOGY
Astronomy consists of the following main categories: Observational Astronomy, Theoretical Astronomy and interdisciplinary studies.
The main source of infomination is Theoretical Astronomy's failure to formulate a coherent model of the Universe, ultimately failing to comply with Mark McCutcheon's theory. While observational astronomy is doing its best to deliver the data, the theorists speak for all and officially adopt flawed or otherwise unsupported theories, without even bothering to seek consensus of all scientists involved in research. In particular, adoption of the Big Bang Theory () at a dispense of the Electric Universe Theory, and complete negligence of the Law of PPP, is a serious violation of KUDOS (), and Elements , and of PRAVDA, which has grave consequences for all science, reaching far beyond Astronomy itself, directly affecting the development of our civilisation.
CHEMISTRY (NS2) 10
25[5,1,1] 4[4,1]=100 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 MATERIALS CHEMISTRY
04[4,0,1] 3[3,1]=012 NEUROCHEMISTRY
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
25[5,1,1] 3[3,1]=075 PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY
25[5,1,1] 4[4,1]=100 THEORETICAL CHEMISTRY
05[5,0,1] 4[4,1]=020 BIOCHEMISTRY
The above are the chief disciplines, which represent a plethora of interdisciplinary branches. Those other fields include Agrochemistry, Astrochemistry (Cosmochemistry), Atmospheric Chemistry, Chemical Engineering, Chemo-Informatics, Electrochemistry, Environmental Chemistry, Femtochemistry, Flavor Chemistry, Flow Chemistry, Geochemistry, Green Chemistry, Histochemistry, History Of Chemistry, Hydrogenation Chemistry, Immunochemistry, Marine Chemistry, Materials Science, Mathematical Chemistry, Mechanochemistry, Medicinal Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Molecular Mechanics, Nanotechnology, Natural Product Chemistry, Oenology, Organometallic Chemistry, Petrochemistry, Pharmacology, Photochemistry, Physical Organic Chemistry, Phytochemistry, Polymer Chemistry, Radiochemistry, Solid-State Chemistry, Sonochemistry, Supramolecular Chemistry, Surface Chemistry, Synthetic Chemistry, Thermochemistry, and many others.
The main source of infomination here is ignorance of Elements and of PRAVDA manifested as a broad stream of contaminated data flowing from other fields. Particularly harmful is an adoption of a flawed model of atom () by Physics, and generally abnormal cell function model () by Biology.
It should also be noted that there is a huge demand for Chemistry by the global industry, which makes it very susceptible to bias under pressure from this side. Most often this involves violating points 1 (C) and 3 (D) of KUDOS, except that TIIT does not recognise them as the Intentional For Field's Merit (I), but merely as Unawareness of Objectives (A).
EARTH SCIENCE (NS3) 7
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
04[4,1,0] 1[4,0]=004 GEOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 GEOPHYSICS AND GEODESY
04[4,0,1] 5[5,1]=020 GLACIOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 OCEANOGRAPHY
25[5,1,1] 1[5,0]=025 PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 SOIL SCIENCE
Disciplines in the table beyond represent the following fields of interdisciplinary science: Anthroposphere, Asthenosphere, Biosphere, Chemical Oceanography, Climatology Earth's Crust, Cryosphere, The Earth's Core, Mantle, Economic Geology, Edaphology, Engineering Geology, Environmental Geology, Exobase, Exosphere, Gemology, Geochemistry, Geochronology, Geographic Information Systems, Geography, Geoinformatics, Geomagnetician Geomikrobiology, Geomorphology, Geosfera, Geostatistics, Global Positioning System (GPS), Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), Heterosphere, Historical Geology, Homosphere, Hydrogeology, Hydrology, Hydrosphere, Ionosphere, Limnology, Lithosphere, Magnetosphere, Earth's Mantle Wedges (), Marine Biology, Marine Geology, Marine Geophysics, Mesopause, Mesosphere (), Meteorology, Micropaleontology, Mineral Physics, Mineralogy, Mining, Noosphere, The Outer Core (), Ozone Layer, Paleoceanography, Paleoclimatology, Paleogeography, Paleontology, Palynology, Soil Science, Pedosphere, Petroleum Geology, Petrology, Physical Geodesy, Physical Oceanography, Planetary Boundary Layer, Planetary Geology, Plate Tectonics (), Quaternary Geology, Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, Sedimentology, Seismology, Spatial Decision Support Systems, Stratigraphy, Stratopause, Stratosphere, Structural Geology, Tectonics (), Thermopause, Thermosphere, Tropopause, Troposphere, Turbopause, Volcanology and many others being developed.
This area is infominated by a stream of data from Theoretical Astronomy, and in particular by the model of the universe based on the Big Bang (). Other sources of infomination is Physics because of the Bohr's model of atom (), incompatible with McCutcheon's, and other sciences, which adopted flawed evolutionary model of development of life on Earth, being a natural consequence of the PPP Law's ignorance.
Earth Science infringes KUDOS in points 1 (C), 2 (U) and 5 (S). Infomination, which most seriously disrupts the flow of information in this field is the defective physical model of a planet. Despite all indications of seismographs and in spite of cosmology based on expansive model of the atom, Physical Geography persistently claims that the Earth is a sphere filled with liquid layers of lava (), and has a heavy nickel nucleus in its center (). Meanwhile, indications of instruments suggest beyond doubt that our planet is a sphere, and more precisely - a hollow toroid. Only such a structure justifies the Earth's crust responding to every hit with bell-like sounds. The Earth's crust is in a state of expansion, extending a dozen or so centimeters a year along the lines that form a kind of clearly defined planes, but by no means "plates"(), which for the purposes of tectonics, would "push against each other," the "pressure" justifying surface tensions and a number of other detected kinetic effects. Meanwhile, all these physical effects are in fact the most obvious, simple to explaine and a natural result of the constant expansion of planet's surface from its center. Let's stress, the expansion, the chief symptom of which is gravity. There is a small sun in the center of the hollow interior of the planet inhabited by us, from which matter keeps flowing in a form of electrons and smaller particles, originating in the suboptical dimensions, expanding from there to our dimension (). This model is supported, for example, by Jupiter's observations, inside which one of the satellites registered a small sun, visible through the hole(!) in its pole.
A brilliant young Australian geographer demonstrated this model in a form of computer animation based on a large oceanographic database, visualising how continents were formed out of a uniform surface and why all coastlines are mutually compatible.
Thus planets are three-dimensional waves, expanding with constant acceleration, causing on their surfaces an illusion of "gravitational pull", ie strength, which in fact does not exist in nature, and is proven beyond doubt by 'Copernicus' of our time in His 'The Final Theory'. An average person is not able to imagine the mechanics of this model, which eludes senses, because we, the observers, are also built of the swelling atoms, so we should not count on its imminent desinfomination.
LIFE SCIENCE (NS4) 54
25[5,1,1] 3[3,1]=075 AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 ANATOMY
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 BIOCHEMISTRY
25[5,1,1] 3[3,1]=075 BIOCOMPUTERS
05[5,0,1] 3[3,1]=015 BIOCONTROL
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 BIODYNAMICS
25[5,1,1] 3[3,1]=075 BIOINFORMATICS
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 BIOLOGY
25[5,1,1] 1[2,0]=025 BIOMATERIALS
05[5,0,1] 4[4,1]=020 BIOMECHANICS
25[5,1,1] 2[2,1]=050 BIOMEDICAL SCIENCE
25[5,1,1] 3[3,1]=075 BIOMONITORING
05[5,0,1] 4[4,1]=020 BIOPHYSICS
25[5,1,1] 4[4,1]=100 BIOPOLYMERS
05[5,1,0] 3[3,1]=015 BIOTECHNOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 BOTANY
05[5,0,1] 4[4,1]=020 CELL BIOLOGY
25[5,1,1] 1[1,1]=025 COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE
05[5,1,0] 4[4,1]=020 COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE
25[5,1,1] 3[3,1]=075 CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
05[5,0,1] 4[4,1]=020 DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
04[4,0,1] 5[5,1]=020 ECOLOGY
04[2,1,1] 4[4,1]=016 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
04[4,1,0] 5[5,1]=020 ETHOLOGY
05[5,0,1] 4[4,1]=020 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
05[5,0,1] 4[4,1]=020 EVOLUTIONARY GENETICS
05[5,1,0] 1[1,1]=005 FOOD SCIENCE
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 GENETICS
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 GENOMICS
05[5,1,0] 1[2,0]=005 HEALTH SCIENCES
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 IMMUNOGENETICS
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 IMMUNOLOGY
09[3,1,1] 3[3,1]=027 IMMUNOTHERAPY
25[5,1,1] 4[4,1]=100 MARINE BIOLOGY
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 MEDICAL DEVICES
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 MEDICAL IMAGING
16[4,1,1] 3[4,1]=064 MICROBIOLOGY
25[5,1,1] 3[3,1]=075 MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
05[5,0,1] 3[3,1]=015 NEUROETHOLOGY
25[5,1,1] 4[4,1]=100 NEUROSCIENCE
01[5,0,0] 1[1,1]=001 ONCOLOGY
25[5,1,1] 3[3,1]=075 OPTOMETRY
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 PARASITOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 PATHOLOGY
01[5,0,0] 3[3,1]=003 PHARMACOGENOMICS
01[5,0,0] 1[1,1]=001 PHARMACOLOGY
25[5,1,1] 4[4,1]=100 PHYSIOLOGY
05[5,1,0] 2[2,1]=010 POPULATION DYNAMICS
05[5,1,0] 1[5,0]=005 PROTEOMICS
05[5,1,0] 3[3,1]=015 SPORTS SCIENCE
25[5,1,1] 3[3,1]=075 STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 SYSTEMS BIOLOGY
09[3,1,1] 5[5,1]=045 WILDLIFE BIOLOGY
09[3,1,1] 5[5,1]=045 ZOOLOGY
The above list is covering all the sub-disciplines, however, due to the field's dynamic development, a plethora of new interdisciplinary branches are being developed as the research progresses. Life Science is one of the most controversial and complex fields of contemporary science, just as the life itself is. Even its very establishment is fresh and came across many hardships. Here, controversies in research build up quickly and pose a lot of trouble to researchers. All human philosophies on life are tested here daily, and there is no authority to approve or disapprove them, accept the field itself while the world is watching. It is very easy to make a bad impression in such an exposure, however, we are aware of the difficulties and the field's effort is recognised by the highest TIIT Index possible,, given the colossal amount of infomination streaming from existing uncontested philosophies, which persistently overwhelm all our sciences and our entire reality as a consequence.
MATERIALS SCIENCE (NS5) 16
09[3,1,1] 1[4,0]=009 BIOMATERIALS
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 CERAMOGRAPHY
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 ELECTROMAGNETIC MATERIALS
05[5,1,0] 5[5,1]=025 FORENSIC ENGINEERING
25[5,1,1] 4[4,1]=100 FORENSIC MATERIALS ENGINEERING
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 GLASS SCIENCE
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 CHARACTERISTICS OF MATERIALS
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 METALLOGRAPHY
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 METALLURGY
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 MICROTECHNOLOGY
05[5,1,0] 5[5,1]=025 NANOTECHNOLOGY MATERIALS
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 SURFACE SCIENCE
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 TEXTILE REINFORCED MATERIALS
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 RHEOLOGY
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 TRIBOLOGY
This department would be a job done with excellence, but the prevailing prejudices in Biomaterials, Forensic Engineering and Nanotechnology Materials (I = 0, P = 0), did not allow for the top rating, and that despite a general understanding of the purpose and excellence in the majority of the rest. Compared with other fields, Materials Science testifies to the best of all humanity. Thanks to this knowledge, we have materials of fabulous properties, fantastic physical and chemical parameters and unsurpassed quality, and our thought is already in other dimensions.
There remains only a question of a proper management of this scientific gift by the industry, which unfortunately is ailing, but that is outside the scope of this science, being dependent on external factors. The problem here lies in the fact that our civilisation has achieved enough in this direction to stop and try to regroup towards bio- and nanotechnologies. No one knows exactly what would it take to realise such an intent, nevertheless, it remains the optimal option for further development of this field, and, happiest of all, if such an initiative came from here, with arguments directly from the lab.
PHYSICS (NS6) 15
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 ACOUSTICS
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 AERODYNAMICS
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 CLASSICAL MECHANICS
05[5,0,1] 4[4,1]=020 CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS
09[3,1,1] 5[5,1]=045 DYNAMICS
25[5,1,1] 1[4,0]=025 ELECTROMAGNETISM
09[3,1,1] 4[4,1]=036 HYDRODYNAMICS
09[3,1,1] 4[4,1]=036 KINEMATICS
05[5,1,0] 5[5,1]=025 MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 OPTICS
01[5,0,0] 5[5,1]=005 PLASMA PHYSICS
01[3,0,0] 1[3,0]=001 QUANTUM MECHANICS
01[1,0,0] 1[1,0]=001 RELATIVITY
09[3,1,1] 5[5,1]=045 STATICS
25[5,1,1] 1[4,0]=025 THERMODYNAMICS
In the evaluation process of the domains listed above, and especially of their merit values, TIIT adopted a theory of an atom's expansion as a point of reference. This is by far the most attractive look at the Physics to date, taking due account of e.g. the Element of Expansiveness,, without which there prevails in Physics the widespread assumption of the light's constant speed (), and this despite a convincing record of its fallacy, recently obtained by research in the Hadron facility. Another consequence of inadequate accountability in Physics against Expansiveness , but also Hierarchy, , is multitude of the elementary particles and chaos in their definitions.
As a matter of fact, all of them may be one and the same particle, being simply in a state of expansion from the suboptical dimension. One cannot check beyond doubt what it is actually like, using existing electron microscopes and particle accelerators, the methodology relying exclusively on breaking down the researched particles, which completely alters the researched object's physical state.
This major infomination is maintained by lack of an official debate in this scientific community regarding, eg. the spontaneous appearance of photons in vacuum or sound mobility at the speed of light and higher. This is due to license restrictions governing the flow of information in areas such as eg. Plasma Physics, where both A and I are of 0 value. This points out to an inadequate awareness of Elements and , without which all the basic concepts in modern Physics, unfortunately, are burdened with a crude flaw.
TIIT strongly believes that their full consideration is not only the key to the future of Physics, but all sciences in general. The highest possible index, given these conditions, index , Physics receives only in recognition of the effort, and often heroism, of those few scientists who, risking their careers and even their own lives, fight the infomination raging in their disciplines, full of flawed theories and outright forgeries. These brave people are trying to protect their fields from grave consequences of their sciences' direct exposure to the effects of infomination. Most often the infomination manifests as a mere absence of a common sense, as in the case of already officially recognised as erroneous Newton's theory of the infamous "universal gravitation", allegedly resulting from the enigmatic "force of gravity". All logic errors in this theory have been exposed by the already mentioned 'Copernicus' of our time in His work 'The Final Theory', and one can only ask: what are the physicists waiting for? The fragmentation of knowledge, though necessary in the development of any discipline, must not be at the expense of principles, as this leads to chaos, as 'Copernicus' of our time illustrated it below:
The Final Theory's absence in Physics, as well as eg. the theory's of the superluminal speeds achieved by sound, are among the largest of a whole series of giant infominations in this science, being the key to our knowledge about the world. This condition needs urgent correction, since without it, Physics cannot be considered a science. It's a very harsh assessment, but it is a consequence of the inconsistency of Physics in determining and observing its own protocol.
It happens when Physics refuses to acknowledge that Newton's theory packed with errors of substance, and Einstein's assumed speed of light's immutability, and that it is the highest one in nature, are absurds. This is the source of a general mess now crippling the infominated basis of this science, called the Standard Theory.
It is a physical impossibility to create a solid theoretical grounds for the science's successful development on such infomination and it was shown already by the mentioned 'Copernicus', who intuitionally took advantage of the knowledge of our Prominent Ancestors, contained in the Nine Volume Book of PRAVDA, and aptly illustrated this tragedy of mankind in the above diagram.
SOCIAL SCIENCES 149
Social Science is a precision tool, and the best tool we ever managed to create for the construction of the Higher Order Civilisation.
Unfortunately, as indicated by Index , we cannot use it properly yet. As a civilisation we are only emerging from the social structure's embryonic phase, the phase in which our group awareness of our goals as a global community was so low that it did not even allow to establish this field of science. Today it is already a fact, and Social Sciences gain momentum, seconding the successful development of the planet's nervous system, the Internet, and its branches that rapidly move our global connectivity and relationship to the next level of organisation. Naturally, the level of infomination here is the greatest amongst all disciplines. Plato believed that someone who does not know Mathematics, should not enter his Academy, or take to science at all. We do not put such high demands to our cadres, so scientists largely stereotype and are unable to effectively use Mathematics and Logic in their research.
It is a consequence of the last "millennium's dark ages", which, as the New Chronology showed, was not there at all, so we were forced to refine the Social Sciences in order steer towards restructuring the entire existing system into the infomination-free civilisation.
ANTHROPOLOGY (SS1) 18
09[3,1,1] 5[5,1]=045 ANTHROPOLOGY OF RELIGION
04[4,0,1] 5[5,1]=020 ANTHROZOOLOGY
09[3,1,1] 4[4,1]=036 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
09[3,1,1] 5[3,1]=045 BIOCULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY
04[4,0,1] 4[4,1]=016 COGNITIVE ANTHROPOLOGY
04[4,0,1] 4[4,1]=016 CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 ECOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
04[4,0,1] 4[4,1]=016 ECONOMIC ANTHROPOLOGY
01[4,0,0] 3[3,1]=003 EVOLUTIONARY ANTHROPOLOGY
25[5,1,1] 4[4,1]=100 FORENSIC ANTHROPOLOGY
04[4,0,1] 1[4,0]=004 LINGUISTIC ANTHROPOLOGY
04[4,0,1] 4[4,1]=016 MEDIA ANTHROPOLOGY
05[5,0,1] 5[5,1]=025 MEDICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
09[3,1,1] 4[4,1]=036 PALAEOANTHROPOLOGY
01[4,0,0] 3[3,1]=003 PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 TRANSPERSONAL ANTHROPOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 URBAN ANTHROPOLOGY
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 VISUAL ANTHROPOLOGY
The task of Anthropology is finding out who is a human being, or otherwise, to answer the question: who or what is a human being? informs that we could not yet figure out PRAVDA of a man, meaning that we still do not know ourselves sufficiently. Number of theories about the origin of humans is still too close to the number of researchers involved, which clearly testifies to the prevailing anarchy and infomination rampant here. As sorry it would sound, we still not only do not know how did we come to this planet, but also why we have such, and no other, body structure and characteristics of intellect. Given the circumstances, it will take some time before we will see light in the tunnel leading to PRAVDA, that's for sure. Source of infomination? All indications are that by stating "... I know that I know nothing ...", Plato gave us a hint that he knew the correct answer.
COMMUNICATION STUDIES (SS2) 15
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 COMMUNICATION SCIENCES
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 COMMUNICATION DESIGN
25[5,1,1] 4[4,1]=100 COMMUNICATION THEORY
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 CRISIS COMMUNICATION
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 HEALTH COMMUNICATION
01[5,0,0] 1[2,0]=001 MASS COMMUNICATION
01[5,0,0] 1[2,0]=001 MEDIA STUDIES
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 MEDIATED COMMUNICATION
01[4,0,0] 1[4,0]=001 ORGANISATIONAL COMMUNICATION
01[5,0,0] 1[1,0]=001 POLITICAL COMMUNICATION
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 RHETORIC
25[5,1,1] 4[4,1]=100 RISK COMMUNICATION
05[5,1,0] 3[3,1]=015 SCIENCE COMMUNICATION
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION
On this field depends the quality of cooperation between social groups at various levels. Modern knowledge about the techniques of communication is impressive, of which tells us the highest rating in the fields of Science Of Communication and Technical Communication. So we have good tools to communicate, however, overall , testifies to the fact that, as in previous cases, we cannot yet use them properly. This department of science may be the key to our civilisation's success, or become a direct cause of its disaster, as it does not take much to realise the profound importance of communication in the multibillion and multicultural population.
ECONOMICS (SS3) 18
01[5,0,0] 1[1,0]=001 BUSINESS ECONOMICS
01[3,0,0] 1[2,0]=001 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
09[3,1,1] 2[2,1]=018 ECONOMIC HISTORY
01[5,0,0] 1[1,0]=001 ECONOMIC SYSTEMS
01[1,0,0] 1[1,0]=001 FINANCIAL ECONOMICS
05[5,1,0] 1[3,0]=005 GENERAL ECONOMICS AND TEACHING
05[5,1,0] 1[4,0]=005 HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE
09[3,1,1] 5[5,1]=045 HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT
09[3,1,1] 5[5,1]=045 INDUSTRIAL ORGANISATION
01[1,0,0] 1[1,0]=001 INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS
05[5,0,1] 3[3,1]=015 LABOR & DEMOGRAPHIC ECONOMICS
05[5,0,1] 1[4,0]=005 LAW AND ECONOMICS
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 MATHEMATICAL METHODS
05[5,0,1] 1[5,0]=005 MACROECONOMICS
05[5,0,1] 1[5,0]=005 MICROECONOMICS
04[4,1,0] 1[5,0]=004 NATURAL RESOURCE ECONOMICS
01[1,0,0] 1[1,0]=001 PUBLIC ECONOMICS
05[5,1,0] 4[4,1]=020 URBAN, RURAL& REGIONAL ECONOMICS
We have already seen that there are areas in science, which are not the happiest, and even do rather poorly. This however, what TIIT observed in the Economy, surpassed its darkest scenarios. It is not even an alarm - as a civilisation we reached the bottom. simply means a flat out zero, as we used to say sometimes at school. This result points out to a structurally flawed system organisation, of a poor design and still worse execution. The recognition of the positive contribution of Mathematical Methods to this chapter, it is only the grant by the surgeon that the patient is still conscious, there exists awareness of Conscience, , in the field, but the rest testifies to the fact that circulation is blocked, or sick, and may lead to a heart attack at any time.
If all of us do not take care of this problem, demonstrating the sincerest will to have it fixed, and if we do not work out together a technique coordinating our effort of getting out of this slump, we are threatened a loss of whatever's left of the consciousness, or simply the clinical death on the operating table, on which as a civilisation we are currently lying. And if it is not a strong enough warning before the inevitable, I do not know what it should be. It is our common tragedy, which nothing can sweeten but a fast and efficient desinfomination of the entire economy, starting at its theoretical foundations. For the time being, no one is allowed to call this pathology "a system" or "a science".
EDUCATION (SS4) 8
25[5,1,1] 2[2,1]=050 BEHAVIOUR MANAGEMENT
09[3,1,1] 3[3,1]=027 CAREER DEVELOPMENT
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 LITERACY
25[5,1,1] 2[2,1]=050 EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP
05[5,1,0] 5[5,1]=025 EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 INCLUSIVE AND SPECIAL NEEDS
05[5,1,0] 5[5,1]=025 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
09[3,1,1] 3[3,1]=027 LEARNING SUPPORT
Low score of this field is a direct result of the lack of a clear definition of a man and his role in the natural environment, resulting in the dimly outlined purpose of social education. In this regard our individual intuitive approach dominates, driven by an impuls of a moment. So we tend to educate in directions consistent with our subjective feelings and any attempt to systematise this process in a broader social scale, very rarely stands the test in practice. The unclear, never refined overall objective of our civilisation must have, and has, specific effects, which in Education are reflected as in a mirror. The lack of purpose will never allow to determine an optimal course of Education for the entire population, while the environmental impact will dictate trends along the lowest of lines of our species preservation. Until these proportions are not eventually set by a fully matured society of the Information Age, Education shall remain the domain of "lacking backbone", blindly seeking its identity.
HUMAN GEOGRAPHY (SS5) 8
25[5,1,1] 4[4,1]=100 CULTURAL GEOGRAPHY
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 GEOGRAPHY OF DEVELOPMENT
09[3,1,1] 4[4,1]=036 GEOGRAPHY OF ECONOMICS
05[5,1,0] 5[5,1]=025 GEOGRAPHY OF HEALTH
04[2,1,1] 4[4,1]=016 HISTORICAL GEOGRAPHY
05[5,1,0] 5[5,1]=025 POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY
16[4,1,1] 2[2,1]=032 GEOGRAPHY OF POPULATION
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 GEOGRAPHY OF SETTLEMENT
It would seem that infomination in an area such as geography can only stem from inaccuracies of measuring instruments, because the "what the horse is like, everyone sees," as we all have contact with this area daily.
Yet the common interpretation of the facts is so arbitrary that we are dealing with colossal inaccuracies. Of course, this is typical of interdisciplinary fields, where the error once committed echoes multiple times throughout many fields of science. The specificity of Human Geography allows for precisely this kind of infections, but also here there is a very strong possibility of arbitrary interpretation of test results, which come up in form of statistics, and these are always susceptible to the manipulation out of non-scientific motives.
in this case shows that most definitely one cannot rely on this field due to a too high level of infomination, except for a bizarre case of Geography of Economics. Geography of Economics's uniqueness lies in the fact that its data are necessary for controlling the relations in line MAN ECONOMY ENVIRONMENT, and they are accurate, but are fully disclosed only under license. Therefore, the field's TIIT Index is as low as if the domain's policy was biased, which is not the case.
HISTORY (SS6) 14
04[4,0,1] 4[4,1]=016 CULTURAL HISTORY
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 DIPLOMATIC HISTORY
05[5,0,1] 5[5,1]=025 ECONOMIC HISTORY
09[3,1,1] 1[2,0]=009 ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY
16[4,1,1] 3[2,1]=048 GENDER HISTORY
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATIONS
04[2,1,1] 4[4,1]=016 HISTORIOMETRY
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 HISTORY OF RELIGION
05[5,0,1] 5[5,1]=020 MILITARY HISTORY
01[4,0,0] 4[4,1]=004 PEOPLE'S HISTORY
16[4,1,1] 2[2,1]=032 PERIODISATION
04[4,0,1] 2[2,1]=008 PUBLIC HISTORY
04[4,0,1] 2[2,1]=008 SOCIAL HISTORY
01[4,0,0] 1[4,0]=001 WORLD HISTORY
In brief, History is now in such shape that it must start applying to obtain the status of 'science'. TIIT was forced to issue such verdict after a due consideration of available records. Sources of infomination in this area are numerous and powerful, starting from a falsified calendar. Today's timekeeping system was adopted in the seventeenth century by the politically motivated circles, in very mysterious circumstances. Recently, mathematicians took the matter into their hands and discovered this real drama - back then nothing less or more but 1,150 years was added to our present calendar, hence the information in source materials is infominated to such an extent that one may count on its reliability in case of 10% of their contents at best. The canvas of this criminal act is better and better known to the declared history researchers, who know today precisely who and why would committ it with such a perfidy, but today, after almost three centuries, it is an outdated and the least important thing. The crucial fact for us at present is the definitive alleviatiation of this gigantic infomination's negative effect and restoring order in our current ideas about the past, so that we were able to start planning for the future properly, that is in accordance with the PRAVDA.
This kind of shock, of course, goes far beyond a single discipline, in addition, not all are aware of this, so we will have to wait for the desinfomination to take effect. And these may turn out to be extensive, multilevel and long-term, so historians, like all of us, face a real challenge - how can the flow of information's giant blockage be cleanned up?
Wherever TIIT assigned more than , it is only because of the individual researchers' extraordinary load of work, at the highest level of their expertise, who often at the risk of their careers, and at times even their lives, managed to finalise the process of a particular segment's desinfomination and announce the results. In the chapters of the book P For Heaven there appear specifics and names of the most prominent among them who keep fighting for social recognition of the TRUTH, PRAVDA, and in Its name call for a debate in their community. So far unsuccessfully, because, as stated at the beginning - history as a science, or a domaine in search for PRAVDA, working on all the available database and open to debate, does not exist yet. TIIT actively supports this line of scientific activity, an example of which is the innovative study of ancient Sumer: POL LYELIS - RULERS OF SUMER. As you can see in the table beyond, in as many as two cases TIIT was forced to assess at the lowest grade for both Awareness of Objectives (A) and Intent For Field's Merit (I). In case of the World History there has come to this a zero value for Policy Bias (P) - a phenomenon deleting this domaine from the list of scientific fields. Until this changes, humanity does not know its own past, and this is wrong, anyone will admit.
LAW (SS7) 7
04[4,0,1] 5[5,1]=020 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 CONTRACT LAW
09[3,1,1] 3[3,1]=027 CRIMINAL LAW
09[3,1,1] 3[3,1]=027 EQUITY AND TRUSTS
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 INTERNATIONAL LAW
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 PROPERTY LAW
04[4,1,0] 3[3,1]=012 TORT LAW
The table above lists the legal disciplines taught at universities, however, Law spreads far beyond the core subjects of these and further disciplines, and is divided into the following categories:
LAW AND SOCIETY: Labour Law, Human Rights, Civil Procedure and Criminal Procedure, Evidence,
Immigration Law andNationality Law, Social Security, Family Law;
LAW AND COMMERCE: Corporate Law, Commercial Law, Admiralty Law and the Law of the Sea,
Intellectual Property Law, Restitution, Unjust Enrichment, Law of Outer Space;
LAW AND REGULATION: Tax Law, Banking Law and the Regulation of the Finance, Legislation,
Competition Law, Consumer Law, Environmental Law.
Because the Natural Sciences have little, or no, impact on this area, the low score is a consequence of many violations of , and notoriously of CUDOS 1(C) and 3(D). Although the science of Law is not separated from the practice of Law, the relationship between the two is not particularly sensible, and especially to the extent that this impact was visible as a systematic improvement of the quality of the letter of the Law. Infomination here continues, and the world is still as far from achieving a satisfactory balance in the general level of justice, as the science of Law is distant from the Ethics in Its CUDOS understanding.
LINGUISTICS (SS8) 23
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 APPLIED LINGUISTICS
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 BIOLINGUISTICS
25[5,1,1] 4[4,1]=100 CLINICAL LINGUISTICS
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS
09[3,1,1] 5[5,1]=045 DEVELOPMENTAL LINGUISTICS
25[5,1,1] 3[3,1]=075 DISCOURSE ANALYSIS
04[4,0,1] 3[3,1]=012 EVOLUTIONARY LINGUISTICS
01[4,0,0] 5[5,1]=005 HISTORICAL LINGUISTICS
25[5,1,1] 4[4,1]=100 LANGUAGE DOCUMENTATION
04[4,0,1] 5[5,1]=020 LANGUAGE GEOGRAPHY
04[4,0,1] 4[4,1]=016 LINGUISTIC TYPOLOGY
25[5,1,1] 2[2,1]=050 MORPHOLOGY
25[5,1,1] 4[4,1]=100 NEUROLINGUISTICS
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 PHONETICS
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 PHONOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 2[2,1]=032 PRAGMATICS
16[4,1,1] 2[2,1]=032 PSYCHOLINGUISTICS
25[5,1,1] 2[2,1]=050 SEMANTICS
16[4,1,1] 2[2,1]=032 SEMIOTICS
04[4,1,0] 3[3,1]=012 SOCIOLINGUISTICS
16[4,1,1] 1[4,0]=016 STYLISTICS
16[4,1,1] 3[5,1]=048 SYNTAX
09[3,1,1] 4[4,1]=036 TRANSLATION
Admittedly, the low overall index , in a field as open to the world as Linguistics is, is quite surprising. Profile analysis of indicators in the table above indicates Linguistics' strengths and weaknesses, however, it's hard to clearly say what is the reason for such a disappoiting result of evaluation.
Based on information scan it can be stated that we are dealing here with a generally poor efficiency in this area, which is responsible for the quality of intercultural communication. A manifestation of this low quality is a fact that individual ethnic groups poorly communicate with each other, despite the dynamic development of international cooperation on a global scale we still do not understand each other satisfactorily.
Generally, extrascientific factors contributed to this state of affairs, but Linguistics itself is not without fault, as evidenced by the lowest Indices of in up to 25% of its sub-disciplines. There we can see that the most aggravating factor is the lack of satisfactory results in terms of geography and history of language development. TIIT analysis proves that this is a consequence of recognition as "unscientific" a record from antiquity that, at the dawn of our civilisation, all humans were using only one speech, which they took over from their Creators.
For some undisclosed reasons, linguists today do not seem to manifest any desire of studying the genesis of human speech, preferring to follow nihilistic concepts lead by the "theory of evolution" (). The majority of researchers often take enormous efforts crumbling in analysing etymology, attaining laryngological level, while glaring lack of substantive synthesis and constructive conclusions in terms of semantics.
All that today we have in linguistics is based on subjective interpretations preferences and presumptions at the level of light literature. It is a result of lack of application of mathematical and IT methods.
In conjunction with the interdisciplinary data, these would effectively rule out the vast majority of arbitrariness reigning today in theories on the origin of languages, introducing here an elementary neatness and orderliness, which in linguistics, so far, unfortunately, remains unseen.
POLITICAL SCIENCE (SS9) 5
09[3,1,1] 2[2,1]=018 COMPARATIVE POLITICS
16[4,1,1] 2[2,1]=032 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
16[4,1,1] 1[5,0]=016 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
16[4,1,1] 1[4,0]=016 PUBLIC LAW
01[5,0,0] 1[4,0]=001 POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY
The list in the table beyond does not cover all areas, and this is because they are often introduced ad hoc, or often and downright modified, or have not had time yet to crystallise in autonomous branches of science. Some departments of Political Science classify specific methodologies of teaching internal policy of a given country as a separate sub-discipline, while others do not recognise such a classification.
In contrast to this traditional classification, some academic departments organise scholarship into thematic categories, including political philosophy, political behavior (inclusive of public opinion, collective action and identity), and political institutions (inclusive of legislatures and international organisations). Political science conferences and journals often qualify the results of their analysis as specific categories. Unfortunately, neither as a science, nor as practice, as we all can see, politics does not fare very well globally. Some say it is simply sick, although it must be objectively admitted that without progress in this area present human population on Earth would not be able to survive.
TIIT thinks that the main reason behind it is its weak philosophical base, and in particular, the general unawareness of and , namely the Law of PPP, according to which, all life forms and cycles of nature everywhere in Cosmos are regulated. The Law of PPP would be a highly reliable point of reference for the global politics, excellent for both theory and practice, and its adoption would immediately correct orientation of the entire discipline. Consequently it would immediately alter the focus of the entire civilisation, at least taking it off short term goals in the international public relations, and shifting it to assistance in construction of naturally healthy global relations based on letter of PRAVDA, . However, due to the general silence on this fundamental matter on regulating law in this field, the infomination here is common and an imminent change of status quo here is not to be expected soon . Moreover, quietly, many authorities profess a machiavellian philosophy, which actually teaches that infomination politician's professional tool. They all forget that mortals are wrong because they do not know PRAVDA.
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (SS10) 5
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
05[5,1,0] 3[3,1]=015 ORGANISATIONAL THEORY
04[4,1,0] 1[5,0]=004 ETHICS IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
05[5,0,1] 4[4,1]=020 POLICY ANALYSIS
01[5,0,0] 1[2,0]=001 PUBLIC BUDGETING
This is one of the youngest scientific fields, and its rise reflects well on the progress of our civilisation, and that the direction is correct, as 'pro publico bono' action is always in line with PRAVDA. Unfortunately, infomination here is wide spread because of the field's close coupling with practice, which is indicated by the zero value for Policy Bias (P) in up to 60% of the subdisciplines.
The demand for qualified staff in government was driven primarily by a legal requirement - at higher levels of government, specialists with higher education in the Public Administration should be employed. So the narrowly specialised field of science was established, however, to develop a sufficiently precise methodology and instruments effort and time is needed, for which this domain is still too young. Taking this into account, the result does not surprise, much less frighten, as it does in case of areas with a long metric, nevertheless the consequences are painfully felt by all of us.
PSYCHOLOGY (SS11) 11
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 EDUCATIONAL & SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY
04[4,1,0] 4[4,1]=016 EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY
04[4,0,1] 2[2,1]=008 INDUSTRIAL-ORGANISATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=048 PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY
16[5,1,1] 1[4,0]=016 SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY
Of all departments in this area the highest ratings received those domains whose agenda is to develop instruments that would enable the introduction of quantifiability to the discipline. As long as psychology is classified as one of the Social Sciences, there will not be too much space in it for measurements and calculation. Humanity has yet to earn a lot of experience to be able to accurately analyse the functioning of the brain and, therefore psychology is facing huge challenges.
General ignorance of Elements of PRAVDA, causes that flow of information shaping social psychology at both the individual and the collective levels, is infominated to a very high degree, as evidenced by merely a sufficient rating for C, Filed's Context Value, and for this discipline fully reflects this state. You could say that Psychology only just aspires to the status of science.
SOCIOLOGY (SS12) 20
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 CULTURAL SOCIOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 1[4,0]=016 ECONOMIC SOCIOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 SOCIOLOGY OF EDUCATION
16[4,1,1] 2[5,1]=080 ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIOLOGY
04[4,0,1] 1[5,0]=004 SOCIOLOGY OF FAMILY, GENDER & SEXUALITY
16[4,1,1] 2[2,1]=032 SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS
25[5,1,1] 3[3,1]=075 INTERNET SOCIOLOGY
09[3,1,1] 4[4,1]=036 KNOWLEDGE & SCIENCE SOCIOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 2[2,1]=032 LAW & PUNISHMENT SOCIOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 SOCIOLOGY OF LITERATURE
04[4,0,1] 5[5,1]=020 MEDIA SOCIOLOGY
01[4,0,0] 3[3,1]=003 MILITARY SOCIOLOGY
01[4,0,0] 2[2,1]=002 POLITICAL SOCIOLOGY
09[3,1,1] 5[5,1]=045 SOCIOLOGY OF RACE & ETHNIC RELATIONS
09[3,1,1] 4[4,1]=036 SOCIOLOGY OF RELIGION
25[5,1,1] 4[4,1]=100 SOCIOLOGY OF SOCIAL NETWORKS
09[3,1,1] 4[4,1]=036 SOCIOLOGY OF PSYCHOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 2[2,1]=032 SOCIOLOGY OF SOCIAL STRATIFICATION
04[4,0,1] 4[4,1]=016 URBAN & RURAL SOCIOLOGY
04[4,1,0] 3[3,1]=012 SOCIOLOGY OF WORK & INDUSTRY
Sociology overlaps with various other disciplines whose object of study is society. Such is the case of Anthropology, Political Science, Economics and Social Philosophy. Many relatively new departments of science, such as Communication Studies, Cultural Studies, Demography and Literary Theory, derive from the experience and use the methods developed by Sociology. The terms "Social Sciences" and "Community Studies" gained its present autonomy thanks to the classical Sociology. Also Social Psychology as separate discipline formed at the intersection of Sociology and Psychology interests, and as such stands out due to its sociological and psychological emphasis. It must be admitted that Sociology, despite not too long internship, managed to contribute to the development of science, but its assessment is still generally low. It is due to a long shadow of those of its subdisciplines that have direct and strong relationships with practice, and these by their nature, interact strongly, as indicated by the zero value of Policy Bias (P). The case of Sociology points to one fundamental relationship - irrespective of a field's length of experience and proficiency, isolating its activities from Elements of PRAVDA, is a direct cause of a high degree, difficult to eliminate infomination.
FORMAL SCIENCES 91
Formal sciences qualify the outcome of natural science. Thanks to them we know what to make of the obtained data and how to plan our actions. The quality of the brain is a natural asset of our own, and by all measures, it seems to be the least infomination area af all human cognitivity. Overall score of the TIIT Index is high, and despite the fact that it leaves some room for improvement, it clearly indicates that we are on the right track on our development as an interstellar species.
All we need to do is to maintain controlling the quality of the information taken for processing at all times, as any leniency in this area means heavy losses in our business of researching the Universe and exploring our existence in it.
COMPUTER SCIENCE (THEORETICAL) (FS1) 7
25[5,1,1] 4[4,1]=100 ALGORITHMS & DATA STRUCTURES
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 CONCURRENT & OTHER SYSTEMS
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 INFORMATION IN DATABASES
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 FORMAL METHODS
25[5,1,1] 4[4,1]=100 INFORMATION & CODING THEORY
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE THEORY
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 THEORY OF COMPUTATION
You can say with full responsibility that Theoretical Computer Science is the youngest and most successful child of modern science. All indications are that the use of computers is a continuing trend, and this entails the constant need for programs and other, more perfect technologies to support them. is a high rating for a very low result of Formal Methodology, which combined with the mediocre level of proficiency of the Theory Of Computation and Information In Databases proves the existence of serious threats to this science from the side of infomination. Formal Methods' low Context Value, CFS1(4), indicates that this drawback is rooted in an insufficient level of Element awareness. Since the methodology is ailing, no wonder the entire field of Informatics had to face the consequences.
DECISION THEORY (FS2) 8
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 BAYESIAN PROBABILITY
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 DECISION FIELD THEORY
25[5,1,1] 4[4,1]=100 DECISION RULES
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 DESIGN RATIONALE
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 ECONOMIC THEORY OF INFORMATION
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 GAME THEORY
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 INFORMATION AND RISK
09[3,1,1] 4[4,1]=036 NEUROSCIENCE OF FREE WILL
It could be a lot better here than a pass mark, but in too many cases there was a breach of ethics, as indicated by the low average Field's Context Value, C. Decision Theory would earn a higher TIIT Index, if activity in this area was of a bigger prestige. However, this can not take place at the humanity's present organisational level, because essentially, this domaine stands in a way of too many centers, which do not stand competition in decision making. If Decision Theory could prove to the world its vitality, for example, by increasing the rate of TIIT in the case of Neuroscience Of Free Will and Economic Theory Of Information, its importance would rise immediately, and results of its activity would have been felt much more globally. Let's add - felt positively by everyone of us. Today we may only have satisfaction of knowing that such science exists and develops.
GAME THEORY (FS3) 8
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 BAYESIAN GAMES
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 CLASSES OF GAMES
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 COMPUTATIONAL MATHEMATICS
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 EQUILIBRIUM CONCEPTS
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 RISK DOMINANCE
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 STRATEGIES
16[4,1,1] 3[2,1]=048 THEOREMS
Game Theory has one essential flaw - it takes on a task that has no future in this world. Our reality, as indicated by all Element, is not a stage created for presentation of our strategic industrialism and life ingenuity. Our reality hands us out its card, but not to play them with it, but to give us a lesson what are the odds in the event we dared for a game. And these are slim, being a mouthful for nil, given the disparities we face, merely considering the forces of Nature. Maybe when we spot it in time, we will then see higher rates TIIT, starting from Equilibrium Concepts. This seems to be worth fighting for, because this would be the ticket for the Game Theory to win the lottery. So far, no luck here is comparable with this domain's condition.br>
INFORMATION THEORY (FS4) 10
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 CODING THEORY
25[5,1,1] 2[2,1]=050 CRYPTANALYSIS
25[5,1,1] 2[2,1]=050 CRYPTOGRAPHY
25[5,1,1] 3[3,1]=075 CYBERNETICS
25[5,1,1] 4[4,1]=100 INFORMATION ALGEBRA
25[5,1,1] 4[4,1]=100 INFORMATION GEOMETRY
25[5,1,1] 2[2,1]=050 INFORMATION GATHERING
16[4,1,1] 1[4,0]=016 PHILOSOPHY OF INFORMATION
25[5,1,1] 2[2,1]=050 QUANTUM INFORMATION SCIENCE
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 SEMIOTIC INFORMATION THEORY
Information Theory, also known globally as IT, belongs to a group of science departments, whose condition has a direct, very tangible effect on the condition of civilisation. If this condition were good, we would experience it everywhere - attention to vital existential details, both at individual and collective levels, would be a rule, not an exception, and everyone would understand, without an additional support for education, that we live in a logically coherent system, in which there is no space for incompetence and information deficiency.
It is not the case because philosophy in this domain is failing. Clearly erroneous assumptions in its philosophical background is a result of ignorance of Element 's weight. Specifically, it is a fact that complementing the condition of communication transparency nowhere plays greater role than just in this key domain of IT. The notorious infomination factor in this discipline is the lack of transparency of information on the agenda. Transparency should be especially observed in cases relevant to existence. It is insufficient here, and one can clearly see it by the lack of public debate on our civilisation's agenda. The responsibility for this lies with the very information theorists, who evidently are unable to design systems with a higher degree of integrity, and as a result, logistic systems assuming no media transparency are implemented, which is a mistake that leads to development of civilisation unaware of hazards and its purpose altogether. It is the condition of this discipline that is indicative of the level of development of our entire civilisation, or level of its organisation. Mess and improvisation reigning here forces spontaneity and unbalanced decision-making elsewhere, to the detriment of the public. This will not change on its own, and here is the role for the information theorists, which in TIIT's opinion is fulfilled only sufficiently, , which proves not good enough for our civilisation's drive for higher organisation.
LOGIC (FS5) 8
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 FORMAL LOGIC
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 INFORMAL LOGIC
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 LOGICAL INFERENCE
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 MATHEMATICAL LOGIC
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 MODEL THEORY
09[3,1,1] 4[4,1]=036 NATURAL LANGUAGE ARGUMENTS
04[4,0,1] 1[4,0]=004 STUDY OF FALLACIES
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 SYMBOLIC LOGIC
Logic is the core of Formal Sciences and its relatively high rating is highly inspiring. There is optimism in this, at least about the state of our thought. It's not bad. One may only wonder over the unsatisfactory mark for the Study Of Fallacies. General underdevelopment of this department is the result of both negligence on the side of Ethics (), expressed by P = 0, and level of proficiency, tipped by the lack of proper Awareness Of Objectives, transpired by A = 0. A properly functioning Study Of Fallacies would find the cause of generally weak implementation of Logic and have arrived with a correction methodology for this pathology. Unfortunately, this is not happening, and it is not for the reasons imposed by external factors, so it is a system error. It is also evident by too weak activity of this environment, which should be the axis of lobbying for preservation of common sense. One often hears about epochal discoveries for instance in contemporary physics and also ab out achievements of prominent mathematicians, however, about achievements of logicians recently it was loud only in antiquity. Today, they are either not popular, or have no particular success at work, or neither this nor the latter. Something should change here, because the weakness of Logic means weakness of our civilisation, and most certainly will not affect positively the condition of our science, and therefore the organisational level of our entire civilisation.
MATHEMATICS (FS6) 21
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 ALGEBRA
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 ARITHMETICS
25[5,1,1] 4[4,1]=100 CALCULUS & ANALYSIS
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 CATEGORY THEORY
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 COMBINATORICS
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 COMPUTATION
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 CONTROL THEORY
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS
25[5,1,1] 4[4,1]=100 GAME THEORY
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 GEOMETRY
25[5,1,1] 4[4,1]=100 GRAPH THEORY
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 INFORMATION THEORY
25[5,1,1] 2[2,1]=050 LIE THEORY
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 MATHEMATICAL OPTIMISATION
09[3,1,1] 5[5,1]=045 MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 NUMBER THEORY
25[5,1,1] 4[4,1]=100 NUMERICAL ANALYSIS
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 PROBABILITY
09[3,1,1] 5[5,1]=045 SET THEORY
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 TOPOLOGY
Mathematics is the Queen of Sciences and as befits a queen, it received the highest rating from TIIT. This fact alone is a ray of hope and a model for all of our science to follow, since other major scientific fields in such a good condition are not.
This is puzzling, even bizarre, the exception proving the rule that overall condition of science is poor. This result confirms that mankind's thinking is good, it can operate flawlessly whether it's a number, or another abstract, it only gets lost when it comes to practical applications of this thinking. On this, unfortunately, Mathematics has no influence, cannot possibly have, and once again, it is clear that the reason for the humanity's lack of success in struggle with nature is not a lack of potential inherited from the Velgie Ancestors, or genetic predisposition and having a perfect brain, but our own nonchalance in the learning process, especially the notorious neglecting familiarisation with Elements of PRAVDA.
Mathematics reminds us every day that throughout eons 1 + 1 = 2, so there is one, unchanging in time and independent of circumstances PRAVDA, which violating daily principles of Mathematics, so called "thinking beings", which we believe we are, are unable to take to their full awareness and nourish their doubts instead. Sorry for those who cannot understand Mathematics, but shame on those who do not respect the Queen of Sciences. They are the disgrace to our civilisation. For a reason Plato banned all those who did not understand the principles of Mathematics from entering his Academy.
STATISTICS (FS7) 17
25[5,1,1] 3[3,1]=075 ACTUARIAL SCIENCE
25[5,1,1] 1[4,0]=025 AUXILIARY SCIENCES OF HISTORY
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 BIOSTATISTICS
25[5,1,1] 1[2,0]=025 BUSINESS STATISTICS
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 CHEMOMETRICS
25[5,1,1] 2[2,1]=050 DATA MINING
25[5,1,1] 3[3,1]=075 DEMOGRAPHY
25[5,1,1] 1[2,0]=025 ECONOMETRICS
16[4,1,1] 2[2,1]=032 ENERGY STATISTICS
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 EPIDEMIOLOGY STATISTICS
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 EVALUATION METHODS
25[5,1,1] 4[4,1]=100 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 IMAGE PROCESSING
25[5,1,1] 1[3,0]=025 INFORMATION STATISTICS
01[5,0,0] 1[3,0]=001 INFORMATION ECONOMICS
25[5,1,1] 3[3,1]=075 MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES
25[5,1,1] 2[2,1]=050 STATISTICS
Statistics has the potential to catch up with Mathematics in the results, but because of a much closer relationship with non-scientific communities, it is impossible in practice. Statistical bill is a matter of first necessity for environments with political and mercantile agenda, so there are situations inevitably leading to the Policy Bias (P). Here, P = 0 occurs in almost 1/3 of cases, just those strongly connected with politics and trade, in which the Statistics is a working tool, and as such is, and always will be, treated instrumentally, so this relationship is natural and lasting.
SYSTEMS THEORY (FS8) 12
25[5,1,1] 3[3,1]=075 COMPLEX SYSTEMS
25[5,1,1] 4[4,1]=100 CYBERNETICS
25[5,1,1] 3[3,1]=075 EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE
25[5,1,1] 1[4,0]=025 LIVING SYSTEMS
25[5,1,1] 1[4,0]=025 SOCIOTECHNICAL SYSTEMS THEORY
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 SYSTEM DYNAMICS
01[4,0,1] 4[4,1]=004 SYSTEMS BIOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 1[4,0]=016 SYSTEMS ECOLOGY
25[5,1,1] 4[4,1]=100 SYSTEMS ENGINEERING
25[5,1,1] 3[3,1]=075 SYSTEMS NEUROSCIENCE
09[3,1,1] 3[3,1]=027 SYSTEMS PSYCHOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 SYSTEMS SCIENCE
This section is a giant leap for mankind in the right direction. For only the analysis of the structure and work of systems is able to give an answer to the question how to shape our civilisation, which is nothing else but a system. Just a satisfactory rating is not surprising, because firstly, the field's activity is too short, and secondly, to derive data from strongly infominated sources such as, for example, Living and Systems Biology Systems, can not give a positive final result. With advances in desinfomination we will see a clear change in the status of this field, whose future is great and central to all science, if only mankind would be able to keep a straight course in relation to its own message.
APPLIED SCIENCES 170
Appplied Sciences are an organoleptic interface for research of reality for all other branches of science. As a civilisation we only proceed from the embryonic phase in the development of the social structure in which the previous group awareness did not even allow to create this direction of science in order to attempt determinning what our global community's common goal should be. Now this is already a fact, and Social Sciences gain momentum, as the gradually developing nervous system of our planet, the Internet and its branches, which quickly improve our global communication and interactivity to the next level. Of course, the level of infomination here is one of the highest among all domains, as we only start learning to use this tool, and the staff are still heavily influenced by prejudice. Unfortunately, this is signaled by higher than anywhere else incidence of zero values for A, I and P. In addition, the low rates of R tell about the varying quality of proficiency and following stereotypes of the past. This is due to lack of ideological orientation, which is just one of the manifestations of societies living in isolation from PRAVDA. This domain is an extremely good, actually a very precise, pointer to the conditions in which human minds operate, what philosophy their activity is based on. Without a profound change in this domain and improved Social Sciences, our civilisation is spiralling downwards. Further development of the whole of the existing system in this way will no longer be productive. We must try to transform it into an infomination-free civilisation as we call it here. Applied Sciences are the following disciplines:
ANTHROZOOLOGY (AS1) 8
09[3,1,1] 4[4,1]=036 ANIMAL BEHAVIOR
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 ANIMAL RIGHTS
09[3,1,1] 3[3,1]=027 ANIMAL STUDIES
04[4,1,0] 2[2,1]=008 ANTHROPOMORPHISM
09[3,1,1] 5[5,1]=045 COGNITIVE ETHOLOGY
09[3,1,1] 5[5,1]=045 COMPANION ANIMAL
25[5,1,1] 1[4,0]=025 SERVICE ANIMAL
09[3,1,1] 4[4,1]=036 ZOOARCHAEOLOGY
Anthrozoology (also called human–animal studies or HAS) is the study of interaction between living objects. It is an interdisciplinary field that is applied to many other fields such as Anthropology, Ethnology, Psychology, Veterinary Vedicine and Zoology. The most infominated fields here are those where there is either a lack of understanding for the discipline's objective, or what it should be dealing with, (I = 0), orthere is a bias towards its policies (P = 0). In others the evaluation is low primarily because of the poor quality of its proficiency. It is a long way for these studies to achieve such a rank, that would be helpful in establishing a world lobby for the animals, as enlightened beings. The job itself will be a controversy for people, as long as humanity itself is at the beginning of the process. Restoring the status to the level of interspecies equality, such as it had been thousands of years ago, when Vedism reigned and nobody wondered eg. the gods had appearances of a monkey, a bird, or a crocodile, but it's probably a matter of at least several decades of strenuous effort and progress in areas such as this, but primarily those that determine the quality level of collective consciousness, or Social Sciences. Meanwhile, as shown by the results in the latter, it is still way too early here for optimism.
APPLIED SCIENCE (AS2) 21
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 APPLIED CHEMISTRY
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 APPLIED ENGINEERING
09[3,1,1] 3[3,1]=027 APPLIED LINGUISTICS
25[5,1,1] 4[4,1]=100 APPLIED MATHEMATICS
16[4,1,1] 2[2,1]=032 APPLIED PHYSICS
25[5,1,1] 2[2,1]=050 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
16[4,1,1] 2[2,1]=032 CERAMIC ENGINEERING
16[4,1,1] 1[2,0]=016 ENERGY STORAGE
01[3,0,0] 1[2,0]=001 ENERGY TECHNOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 ENGINEERING PHYSICS
25[5,1,1] 2[3,1]=050 ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY
04[4,1,0] 1[2,0]=004 ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
01[4,0,0] 1[2,0]=001 ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY
03[3,0,1] 4[4,1]=012 FISHERIES SCIENCE
04[4,0,1] 3[3,1]=012 FORENSIC SCIENCE
16[4,1,1] 2[2,1]=032 FORESTRY SCIENCE
05[5,0,1] 4[4,1]=020 MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
25[5,1,1] 4[4,1]=100 MICROTECHNOLOGY
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 OPTICS
25[5,1,1] 2[2,1]=050 SECURITY ENGINEERING
05[5,1,0] 3[3,1]=015 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Applied Science is the axis of the entire science domain of the same name. They therefore contain in itself all the other sciences fragments, and frequent crossing of competence, or mirroring operations issues cannot be found surprising. In the heat of the research activity it is impossible to avoid such situations in practice no one was surprised. In this state of things one should rightly expect a slightly lower TIIT Index indications, but in fact, it is surprisingly low, and above all, it seems to be disproportionate against the technical progress visible everywhere. Generally speaking, it is in line with this principle - "ajck of all trades - master of none". Besides the honorable exceptions visible in the table above, it is a conspicuous rule here.
means "fail", which is meritorious as Applied Science so far, unfortunately, does not quite work in our favor. Low K-factor rating indicates the degree of discord with , or a general move away from the course on PRAVDA, which indicates that these sciences not yet know for what purpose they have been established. At this stage we can only wish them that this state of affairs would undergo a major change as soon as possible, particularly in the Energy Technology and Environmental Engineering. These two disciplines have a special status - they impinge on the profile of our civilisation and its status on the planet. In its present state, thanks to fields of science such as these, we are here on this planet a biological growth, senselessly and without skill, though with a large and growing devastating performance, wearing its natural resources. Changing this state of affairs is our most urgent task in the coming decades, or ... no, we have no alternative, things have gone too far. We need to bring this area into compliance with all of PRAVDA's as soon as possible.
ARCHAEOLOGY (AS3) 5
05[5,0,1] 5[5,1]=025 ARCHAEOMETRY
04[4,1,0] 4[4,1]=016 CULTURAL RESOURCES
03[3,1,0] 3[3,1]=009 ETHNOARCHAEOLOGY
05[5,0,1] 4[4,1]=020 EXPERIMENTAL ARCHAEOLOGY
04[4,1,0] 3[3,1]=012 HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY
This domain is one big infomination. No exceptions. It is true that TIIT did not register any offenses against professional ethics here, because P = 1 in each case, which is curious in light of the sky hitting records proving the contrary, while everywhere else shortfalling with respect of the Intent For Field's Merit (I), or insufficiency in Awareness of Objectives (A). Anda score of zero in any of these parameters kicks the domain out of the pale of tolerance of PRAVDA and disqualifies it as a science. In this situation, very low level of the general community's familiarity with its past is not surprising. What is surprising though is a fact that in this condition we manifest aspirations to extraterrestrial travels, to modify the natural environment, and that we feel the Earth's leading species. Why? With science in condition such as this, we have no right to any of these behaviors. Neither morally nor technically we are in order. in Archeology it is not our civilisation's final exam failure - it is the lack of qualifications to claims as being one. We are not a civilisation - we are a mess.
COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY (APPLIED) (AS4) 8
25[5,1,1] 2[2,1]=050 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
25[5,1,1] 4[4,1]=100 COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE
25[5,1,1] 3[3,1]=075 COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE
25[5,1,1] 4[4,1]=100 COMPUTER GRAPHICS
16[4,1,1] 2[2,1]=032 COMPUTER SECURITY
09[3,1,1] 2[2,1]=027 HEALTH INFORMATICS
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 INFORMATION SCIENCE
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Computer Technology is one of the youngest areas, exuberantly grew in just a few decades to impressive size, but TIIT Index of mere, does not impress. Technically, its condition is very good, R = 5 being the best and occurs in 50% of disciplines, but a total score of "three" suggests that something went wrong - what did? The table above points out to the faulty C factor, a poor awareness of the field's situation in the context of PRAVDA. K ratio, which sets out the basis of this value, this compliance in the field of ethics which, even with a total purity of the moral approach to her (P = 1), will result in a low grade if you prevail in the area, eg. mercantilism, and it will set the pace of growth and shape profile of the technology department. In the case of Computer Technology, which took the lead among technology components for our civilisation's nerve, it is clearly is not up to the essential, in line with PRAVDA, task of organizing the transition of our civilisation to a higher level system. It may sound as meaningless platitude, but it is not so, since TIIT is in possession of records, providing for far-reaching technological inefficiencies that are not a result of any deficiencies in technique, but are a result of ignorance of PRAVDA's . These occur especially where Computer Technology is entering competencies of a living person, that is in the fields of Artificial Intelligence, Health Informatics, etc. This is so because without the full awareness of man's role in the world and knowing the limits of his competence, it is impossible to correctly position technology supporting him. that is, assign them a ramification, primarily such as a precise definition of the scope of interference of artificial intelligence in the brain. Without a thorough discernment of Element further progress in this field is impossible, and awareness of the need must mature in science as soon as possible.
ELECTRONICS (AS5) 9
09[3,1,1] 2[2,1]=027 ATOMTRONICS
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 AUDIO ENGINEERING
25[5,1,1] 1[3,0]=025 BROADCAST ENGINEERING
25[5,1,1] 3[3,1]=075 COMPUTER ENGINEERING
25[4,1,1] 2[2,1]=050 ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING
25[4,1,1] 3[2,1]=075 ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY
25[5,1,1] 3[3,1]=075 MARINE ELECTRONICS
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 POWER ELECTRONICS
16[4,1,1] 2[2,1]=032 ROBOTICS
This field is close to the Computer Technology because its dynamic development owes it a large part, therefore, not surprising, the same result. Mutual coupling of these areas is natural and obvious as one without the other would not be the same, so the source of their infomination is similar. In Electronics we have to deal with even higher levels of the proficiency than in Computer Technology, R = 5 2/3 disciplines, but its C has a lower value, so the problem is the same - lack of sufficient knowledge in the field of Element . This means that the Electronics in the nearest future will be at crossroads. We may find that its further development will not make sense due to the discoveries of other technologies, in which electrons will no longer be the fundamental carriers of information and energy. TIIT Institute has indications that such new technologies are on the horizon of our science, and will soon be revealed by the progress in desinfomination.
ENERGETICS (AS6) 6
01[4,0,0] 1[2,0]=001 ENERGY & TECHNOLOGY PRINCIPLES
04[4,0,1] 2[2,1]=008 ENERGY EFFICIENCY OPPORTUNITIES
01[4,0,0] 1[2,0]=001 ENERGY OPTIONS & ECONOMY
04[2,1,1] 2[2,1]=008 LOW EMISSION TECHNOLOGIES
04[4,0,1] 1[1,1]=005 POWER GENERATION TECHNOLOGIES
03[3,1,0] 1[1,0]=003 POWER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
As for Energetics, one can only conclude that "it's darkest under a lamp". The field of basic social needs has the lowest level of awareness of these. Primary Elements of PRAVDA indicate that we are immersed along with the entire planet in the immense, omnipotent ocean of energy occurring in both perceptible and inperceptible forms to the human senses, and in spite of this the domain is infominated to a maximum, and that at its very base. It is primarily about strong infomination of the Awareness of Objectives (A) and the Intent for Field's Merit (I), and a high level of Polisy Bias (P) in this field, where the calculated value averages zero. It is a real unique in all science and means that both substantive and contextual value of this discipline is a premeditated infomination so by the scientific factors, as well as non-scientific. As long as the state remained in power, which equally covers science and industry, our civilisation can not count on organisational advancement.
ENGINEERING (AS7) 18
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 AEROSPACE ENGINEERING
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 AUDIO ENGINEERING
25[4,1,1] 1[4,0]=025 BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
25[5,1,1] 3[3,1]=075 CIVIL ENGINEERING
09[3,1,1] 1[2,0]=009 EARTH SYSTEMS ENGINEERING
25[5,1,1] 5[5,1]=125 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
25[5,1,1] 3[3,1]=075 INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 FORENSIC ENGINEERING
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=100 MATERIALS ENGINEERING
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=100 MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=100 MINING ENGINEERING
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=100 NAVAL ENGINEERING
03[3,1,0] 1[4,0]=003 NUCLEAR ENGINEERING
09[3,1,1] 5[5,1]=045 NANOENGINEERING
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 PETROLEUM ENGINEERING
It would seem that Engineering in such a technocratic civilisation as ours should rank at the highest level. However, as seen in the table above, it is not so, and as a result a closer analysis does not inspire optimism that this condition can quickly change. It cannot and will not be, because this domain, although nominally called 'science', is primarily a technology department, and as such, is organically bound with non-scientific fields, primarily from industry. This has its consequences, and namely the fact that the industry, being the "muscle" of civilisation, does not deal with analysis of abstracts, eg. such as the search for an answer to the question "where are we going to?". This is most evident in Biomedical Engineering and Earth Systems Engineering, both scoring P = 0, which means that there are not even signs of good will to walk towards PRAVDA, in accordance with its Element .
Biomedical Engineering believes that it is essential in supporting biotechnology, imposing its point of view to others, and it is so suggestive that its proposal for an artificial limb gained more support among decision makers and opinion-forming factors than to regrow limbs project based on the existing base of stem cells in the body, which even he was never publicised in the mainstream media. You can try to argue that there is no fault in this same area, but this is not so, because the ethics, or awareness of Element , requires that representatives of a given domain do not get involved in projects affected by error. Improving the Creator can never be regarded as a virtue and this case in Biomedical Engineering is a classic mistake, along with leanings of the Earth Systems Engineering, to improve geosystem without even basic insight in the Primary Elements , and especially and , informing about the structure and physics of planets. An equally long shadow on Engineering's reputation casts Nuclear Engineering, activities of which only contribute to the expansion of the barriers of humanity to the progress of civilisation. Engineering - YES, but infominated Engineering, or an unethical pseudoscience - NO.
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE (AS8) 7
16[4,1,1] 2[2,1]=032 AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE
16[4,1,1] 1[3,0]=016 AIR & WATER POLLUTION
04[4,1,0] 1[4,0]=004 ENERGY & MINERAL DEPLETION
04[4,0,1] 1[2,0]=004 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
16[4,1,1] 1[3,0]=016 GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
01[1,0,0] 1[2,0]=001 HABITAT DESTRUCTION
01[5,0,0] 1[4,0]=001 NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
And what to expect from a civilisation that it is not aware of PRAVDA? The ecological disaster on the planet has not yet reached its peak, but our industry and politics do everything to achieve this goal. This approach is not officially declared, the alarming tone is heard in media and the politically correct actions are organised to mobilise the public to step up and make their efforts to protect the natural environment, but a cold eye look at the situation in science and technology reveals the sad truth that these areas, unfortunately, do not have this in their agenda. In this field we are dealing with the worst form of infomination - program rejection of the ethics in professional practice, of which tells P = 0 in a 6-in cases for 7.
The table above shows that in two cases a mix of both A = 0 and I = 0, which is these disciplines' declared and complete departure of PRAVDA. The test of credibility of the TIIT Index in this case is the state of ecology and environmental condition of the Earth. For all those in doubt let the alarming signals be stains of crude oil spilled over the Gulf of Mexico and the Arctic and mass of debris of the extent of a continent floating in the Pacific. And all those still unconvinced let them take a look at the radioactivity levels in the waters of the oceans after the largest disaster in Fukushima, and let them count numbers of animals with affected by cancerous changes in their bodies. Of course that the scientific discipline alone does not hold direct responsibility for this state of affairs, however, its status would impute to it sufficiently. is an indisputable maximum that can be afforded, at the best of will.
MEDICINE (AS9) 62
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=100 AEROSPACE MEDICINE
04[4,0,1] 3[3,1]=012 ANESTHESIOLOGY
25[5,1,1] 3[3,1]=075 BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 CARDIOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 1[4,0]=016 CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 CONSERVATION MEDICINE
09[3,1,1] 4[4,1]=036 CYTOGENETICS
05[5,1,0] 2[2,1]=010 DENTISTRY
09[3,1,1] 4[4,1]=036 DERMATOLOGY
04[4,0,1] 4[4,1]=016 DIETETICS
09[3,1,1] 5[5,1]=045 DISASTER MEDICINE
09[3,1,1] 4[4,1]=036 ECOLOGICAL MEDICINE
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 ENDOCRINOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE
16[4,1,1] 1[4,0]=016 EVOLUTIONARY MEDICINE
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 FAMILY MEDICINE
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 FORENSIC MEDICINE
09[3,1,1] 3[3,1]=027 GASTROENTEROLOGY
16[4,1,1] 2[2,1]=032 GENERAL SURGERY
01[2,0,0] 1[2,0]=001 GERIATRICS
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 HAEMATOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 HEPATOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE
09[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=045 IMMUNOLOGY
25[5,1,1] 1[2,0]=025 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
09[3,1,1] 2[2,1]=018 INTERNAL MEDICINE
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 MEDICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE
09[3,1,1] 2[2,1]=018 MEDICAL ETHICS
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 MEDICAL GENETICS
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 MEDICAL HUMANITIES
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
16[4,1,1] 2[2,1]=032 MEDICAL LABORATORY
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 MICROBIOLOGY
25[5,1,1] 3[3,1]=075 NEPHROLOGY
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 NEUROLOGY
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 TOMOGRAPHY
09[3,1,1] 4[4,1]=036 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
25[5,1,1] 2[2,1]=050 OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE
03[3,1,0] 2[2,1]=006 ONCOLOGY
09[3,1,1] 3[3,1]=027 OPHTHALMOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 OTOLARYNGOLOGY
04[4,0,1] 4[4,1]=016 PATHOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 2[2,1]=032 PEDIATRICS
16[4,1,1] 1[2,0]=016 PHARMACOLOGY
16[4,0,1] 1[1,1]=016 PLASTIC SURGERY
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 PODIATRIC MEDICINE
03[3,0,1] 3[3,1]=009 PSYCHIATRY
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 PULMONOLOGY
03[3,1,0] 1[2,0]=003 PUBLIC HEALTH
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 RADIOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 REHABILITATION
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 RHEUMATOLOGY
25[5,1,1] 2[2,1]=050 SEXUAL MEDICINE
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 SLEEP MEDICINE
25[5,1,1] 2[3,1]=075 SPORTS MEDICINE
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 LASER SURGERY
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 THERAPEUTICS
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 ULTRASONOGRAPHY
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 UROLOGY
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 VETERINARY MEDICINE
Medicine has an eclectic collection of science and technology disciplines, interconnected with each other and with all other areas of human knowledge. The extent of this knowledge and complexity of the information contained in it is so vast that it is customary to say that this is not a branch of science, but an art. And indeed, great scientists here can be counted on one hand. This is a radical opinion, perhaps, but true, if only due to the following criterion - how many experts in this field can boast on significant achievements in the fight against the biggest ailment of man, that is the aging and death? The reality is that 99.9% of them do not even qualify these ailments as diseases.
No, you cannot accuse physicians, and their colleagues from other industries related to medicine, of bad faith, of which tells us P = 0 recorded only in 5 cases out of five dozen. So acceptance of professional ethics is high, less so with the average Respect For CUDOS (K). is therefore primarily because of the external factors, but at the same time human resources in full employment cannot be justified for this state of affairs. Zeros obtained for A and I are due to their conscious departure from Awareness of the Field's Objectives and sabotaging the proficiency. Even if in a formal employment relationship or on contract direction of operations is not going according to expectations PRAVDA, employees have the right to draw their superiors' attention to the facts , and these have a powers to consider the validity of an application and in the right circumstances, if necessary, to bring an amendment to the agenda. Unfortunately, modern Medicine such situations are not observed on the agenda. Glorious exceptions are so few that one might think they are only for show, for policy purposes or for the media, because they thrive on sensation. A classic example here can be information about the the world's first ever project of a head transplant, publicised by all the tabloids, while zero information on the progress of genetics in the study of properties of proteins responsible for a natural process of rebuilding tissues lost by the body that has been achieved at the same time. Apparently an option of regrowth of limbs and organs by means of our own organism is not taken into account by decision-makers on developments in the field, regardless of the quality and size of the progress made by prominent researchers in a given direction. In these circumstances looks like a note of high praise and TIIT Institute understands exactly so.
NANOTECHNOLOGY (AS10) 18
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 BIONANOSCIENCE
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 MATERIOMICS
09[3,1,1] 5[5,1]=045 MECHANOSYNTHESIS
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 MOLECULAR DESIGN SOFTWARE
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 MOLECULAR MACHINERY
09[3,1,1] 5[5,1]=045 MOLECULAR MANUFACTURING
09[3,1,1] 4[4,1]=036 MOLECULAR MECHANICS
09[3,1,1] 3[3,1]=027 NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 NANOENGINEERING
09[3,1,1] 5[5,1]=045 NANOFLUIDICS
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 NANOMATERIALS
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 NANOMETROLOGY
09[3,1,1] 4[4,1]=036 NANOROBOTS
09[3,1,1] 4[4,1]=036 NANOSYSTEMS
16[4,1,1] 2[2,1]=032 NANOTECH BOTTOM-UP APPROACH
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 NANOTECH FUNCTIONAL APPROACH
16[4,1,1] 2[2,1]=032 NANOTECH TOP-DOWN APPROACH
25[5,1,1] 1[4,0]=025 NANOWEAPONS
Just a second decade of existence, and already operates 18 full artykularnych fields of nanotechnology, which grew louder achievements in the world. TIIT Institute appreciates innovation in this field, which in itself is a value and made all A, I and P are the maximum, with one exception deserved P = 0 for nanoweapons. Nanotechnology is the technology movement in the right direction, with immense potential, eg. For the protection of the environment, through the ability drastic reduction or even elimination of the consumption of mineral resources of the planet. This area can contribute to the restructuring of the entire science and technology to energy, computer science and medicine in the first place.
Nanotechnology is probably the most fascinating because of being an authentic portal to yet undiscovered dimension - sub-optical - referred to by the Nine Books of Knowledge and which is not less important for our civilisation than interstellar space. Because of its size, it is close to us, but paradoxically, at this stage, not easier to penetrate, because our science is not yet familiar with the Element of PRAVDA, especially with the expansiveness of the matter in all its dimensions, and therefore space. It is interesting if nanotechnology will find a technology that would allow for observations of supersmall particles, invisible even to the best electron microscopes, and even more fascinating, find a way for us to be able to participate in the expansion of matter.
Such technology would allow for actual travel in microcosmos, which would mean disappearing of our optics and becoming genuinely invisible in the process of physical contraction. Discoveries of this measure are the future of this field, but only on condition that it quickly assimilates all Elements of PRAVDA.
NUCLEAR SCIENCES (AS11) 8
16[4,1,1] 4[4,1]=064 NUCLEAR BIOTECHNOLOGY
16[4,1,1] 5[5,1]=080 NUCLEAR C-ALGEBRA
25[5,1,1] 3[3,1]=075 NUCLEAR ENGINEERING
03[3,0,1] 2[2,1]=006 NUCLEAR PHYSICS
09[3,1,1] 2[2,1]=018 NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY
25[5,1,1] 1[5,0]=025 NUCLEAR POWER SCIENCE
09[3,1,1] 1[4,0]=009 NUCLEAR REACTOR TECHNOLOGY
25[5,1,1] 1[3,0]=025 NUCLEAR WEAPONRY
This area is the pride of the twentieth century, but unfortunately, in the twenty-first century it turns out to be an anachronism. Hopes of nuclear technology, unfortunately, have not been fulfilled. This science has proven that uninfominated knowledge may cause more harm than good and threats than satisfaction. As a result of research conducted by means of a Hadron facility on photons, Nuclear Physics actually stood at crossroads. It turned out that the speed of light is not constant, which although it has not been publicised, today is quietly recognised and nuclear physicist know well that it is still not well researched characteristics of matter, and are forced to spin new hypotheses. Meanwhile, new theories such as eg. gaining more and more popularity the theory of "dark matter", explains only fragmentarily local issues, and although, in fact, they are already closer to PRAVDA, the whole of this science is far from scientific consistency and precision. 'Copernicus' of our time discusses it expertly in his book 'The Final Theory', recalling that Particle Physics entirely overlooked to draw conclusions from the spontaneous appearance of photons in a vacuum, a clear evidence of existence of the expansiveness of matter, consistent with the ancient Vedic mention that in the structure of PRAVDA developed by TIIT is marked by . TIIT Index. It is therefore deserved low. In three cases, P = 0, which indicates reluctance program these disciplines to respect the principles of ethics, by continuing to develop technologies lethal for the planet and its biosphere.
In this categoy are included domains, which in by TIIT Index evaluation do not qualify as sciences because of breaches of CUDOS norm, are of our interest for analysis, as they have a profound impact on large numbers of members of the general community. As the progress of the Infomation Age's enlightement is taking effect, we will observe decline of those fields, however, predicament they clearly pose to science by their misinterpretation of scientific results and influencing the community with these, is expected to persist for as long as the mass of the undereducated public is reaching the critical number.
The chief infominating factor in this area is the above mentioned phenomenon of our brain's capacity of reading and interpreting data in its own context and ability of constructing worlds of its own, at times completely detached from the tangible reality.
It is a positive thing as long as we see it as an exercise for stretching limits of our imagination, otherwise it is a nuissance to humankind's harmonious development and a shear infomination, and as such, should be subject to strict controlling regimes at all times.
OCCULT (MS1) 5
01[4,0,0] 2[2,1]=002 ARIOSOPHY
16[4,1,1] 3[3,1]=048 ASTROLOGY
04[4,1,0] 5[5,1]=020 MYSTICISM
16[4,0,1] 5[5,1]=020 PARANORMAL
01[4,0,0] 3[3,1]=003 THEOSOPHY
Generally, the lowest rate of TIITX faithfully reproduces the field's profile, which today does not have much in common with science, except contribution to the analysis of historical data, which requires knowledge of Statistics. Astrology is the least infomination here, in the ancient past, the queen of science and knowledge without which no ruler dared to sit on a throne. This time, however, mankind has already passed, and the Occult's former position could only be restored by wave of discoveries in Astronomy and Condensed Matter Physics, specifically, in the event that it would provide sufficient data to reproduce the original content encoded in these disciplines, and currently functioning as loose, exotic tinted, threads divorced from reality. That is a possibility, because the origin of these domains, albeit shrouded in the past, it had to have a very strong rational basis in the form of remittances from the real authentic form, describing real events based on real, in line with data aligned with of PRAVDA. One can easily imagine a situation in which distortions and accretions interpretation could eventually be desinfominated on the basis of fresh and reliable information, and then we would see the field in the light of restoring its former glory. TIIT wishes researchers success on this road and follows with interest the progress.
PARASCIENCE (MS2) 7
09[3,1,1] 5[5,1]=045 ALCHEMY
04[2,1,1] 4[4,1]=016 ASTROLOGY
04[1,1,0] 1[1,0]=001 DIVINATION
08[3,1,1] 4[4,1]=032 NATUROPATHY
09[3,1,1] 5[5,1]=045 PARAMEDIC
02[2,0,1] 1[1,1]=002 PSEUDOSCIENCE
01[4,0,0] 1[1,0]=001 SCIENTISM
Here one can find some more rationality in the approach to the subject of research, but in general is not a sufficient outcome, as in the case of the Occult, and, like there, an analysis of the reasons for this state of affairs shows all analogies discussed there. Parascience, as the name suggests, is not a science, by definition, what TIIT said the low level of R, resulting from poor quality workshop. In almost half of the cases K is of the minimum value, which means that the condition of ethics in this field is poor, so the overall result is not surprising. Like Astrology, and Alchemy, it was also a great scientific field in distant past, and just as in the previous cases, all its splendor went into oblivion. Parascience, like the Occult, can count on its revival only in the event when the latest from science delivers fresh data, based on which restoring this domain as a science would be possible. It cannot be ruled out that the information, currently ill, or even mistakenly interpreted, in the light of the valuable information obtained with scientific methods could become a canvas, on which Parascience could be reborne in its former splendor. TIIT wishes of success on this path.
THEOLOGY (MS3) 6
04[4,1,0] 1[4,0]=004 ANTHROPOLOGY OF RELIGION
09[3,1,1] 4[4,1]=036 COMPARATIVE RELIGIOUS STUDIES
04[4,1,0] 1[4,0]=004 HISTORY OF RELIGIONS
03[3,1,0] 1[2,0]=003 PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION
04[4,1,0] 1[3,0]=004 PSYCHOLOGY OF RELIGION
03[3,1,0] 1[3,0]=003 SOCIOLOGY OF RELIGION
Theology is a field examining various aspects of the phenomenon of religion, but its roots date back to a glorious past in which religion was a science. There was no science in ancient times in our understanding. There was Veda, the Knowledge from our Heavenly Ancestors, Pol Lyelis, the Giants, lit. Children of God in Heaven, being passed authoritatively on communities by Pol Lyelis, the Giants human delegates, who chose certain interpretations of reality in their philosophical systems, as recommended by their senior mentors, and becoming spiritual leaders. A specialised scientific activity in our sense was unknown so the researchers at the same time had become priests in shrines, which were at the same time schools and meeting places of professionals of all specialisations. Regular lectures in these educational educational centers transformed into local cults and, over time, naturally into religious systems of universal influence. At the early civilisation stage of a small human community, the leaders' teachings were adopted in the belief that as the genetic descendants of our civilisation's founders, Pol Lyelis, also known collectively as the Paljakas or the Ninebhas, these sages knew in depth the principles of the Truth, or the Knowledge of the Nine, and the world is not for them. mystery. as their philosophies kept turning into local cults and then in larger religious systems. It was enough at the early civilisation stage of a small human community. Education of the laders was then accepted in the belief that as the genetic descendants of our civilisation's founders, Pol Lyelis, also known as the Palyaks, or The Heavenly Ones, these sages knew in depth the principles of PRAVDA. the Truth, or the Knowledge of the Heavenly Ones, and the world is not a mystery to them. they know the principles of Truth, PRAVDA ie, Knowledge of the Heavenly Ones. Unfortunately, the habit of accepting their teachings by faith, especially without observing the principle of CUDOS's skepticism, has caused the teachings of these leaders to fossilise in the form of dogmas. Faced with the contradictions of these dogmas in confrontation with reality, encountered by societies with growing intensity in the process of their development, the only solution was to create more and more new teaching systems, the dogmatism becoming stronger as the leaders were less familiar with the source of PRAVDA. In this way, in the course of history, the tradition of religious cults came into being, having no relationship with scientific activity at all. Paradoxically, in the philosophical systems centered around Tibet, the most consistently adhering to the Vedic definition of PRAVDA, which is consistently understood there as the Para Veda, the Celestial Knowledge, CUDOS principles are fully respected exemplarily, and even religions based on Vedism, ie. Buddism, allow the use of skepticism, bestowing the highest respect to the Element of . In these systems, the chief invocation is not "Pray!", being asking for help by the helplessness against the vastness of the the Celestial Knowledge, but "Think!", put down in the Heavenly Languages as "Um!", in others "Om!", "Ohm!" e.t.c.
Each of the emerging "sciences" dogmatically usurped the right to an exclusive knowledge of PRAVDA and called itself "science", failing to realise though that the moment it broke the CUDOS rule, it was not one any longer. This custom we observe in all the major religions of the world, and these are the philosophical systems created as a result of the rebellion against the descendants of Pol Lyelis, which took place in the Levant millennium ago. This resulted in the departure of a large part of our civilisation from the Vedism, resulting in the emergence of movements and philosophies that usurp the conscience of PRAVDA, the Truth, and called their teachings 'religions'. For these reasons, the status of religion nowhere in the world bears the mark of scientific activity, and therefore, from the scientific field to which Theology has been qualified, only Comparative Religious Studies can be considered in this respect. It received the highest rating,, which is a distinction compared to other disciplines of this field and a proof of recognition of its contribution to science. It is also the only field where the TIIT Indices, A, I and P, reach the maximum, which means a professional correctness here in every respect. The low rating of R = 3 for the field's proficiency is a result of negligible authority of the religious studies, and specifically its inability or the incapability to forward the results of its investigations to global community. It is also a message from Theology as a discipline of knowledge, which is hereby settled.